Posts: 11
comsparks
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
#1
If I right click on the desktop and select Change Desktop Background the program does not work. I have to go into system/preferences/appearance and change it there. Any ideas. Thanks
Posts: 1,520
eriefisher
Joined: 07 Oct 2007
#2
What desktop/wm are you using?

eriefisher
Posts: 11
comsparks
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
#3
I'm using Gnome
Posts: 1,520
eriefisher
Joined: 07 Oct 2007
#4
I never used gnome much, I just really dislike it. My guess is your probably missing a plugin for the desktop. What package did you use to install it? There are a few, gnome. gnome-core and gnome-desktop-environment.

eriefisher
Posts: 11
comsparks
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
#5
I used gnome. Everything seems to be working great except that one now.
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,955
Site Admin
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
#6
Hi comsparks,

I'm another non-user of gnome (I don't like it, but each to his/her own)
so my advice is limited.
When you installed gnome, did you do
apt-get install gnome-desktop environment

I think this brings everything that gnome desktop has to offer, whereas an apt-get install gnome selects the base(ic) libs and apps.

I could well be wrong, but have a look in synaptic and see if there is anything there that looks like it needs to be installed to get what you want. ie what app is 'responsible for changing the desktop.

Good luck!
Posts: 11
comsparks
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
#7
I installed Gnome not the gnome-desktop-environment package. Yes I've gone through looking for an app and have not found anything that helped. I did try installing the G-D-E package and it said that It was already the most current. I keep running into people disliking Gnome for some reason. I've tried a ton of distributions and like Gnome apps a lot better than KDE apps. This version is the fastest one I've ever used and just blows the doors off any KDE out there I've tried for speed.
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,955
Site Admin
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
#8
Hey, I"ll take that as a compliment!

If you want to compare kde with gnome (speed wise), you could install a minimal kde desktop with kde-base. It is also very fast on antiX.

antiX uses a lot of gnome apps rather than kde ones as it is much easier to keep the distro size down. Now, this is good on the one hand for those that like a less integrated desktop environment, a sort of mix-and-match (ie me), but for a fully integrated desktop, I think kde is the best. Now I say that even though I never use kde anymore (except to see what is going on in test distros I like ie sidux). Sure kde is 'bloated' for those with less than 256 MB RAM, but with higher RAM it does work fast.

Back to your problem. I really have no idea what is missing. Maybe xtoecutter will pop in and give his experience as he installed gnome to the antiX-base.

I think I should really push this base.iso more. From feedback, it has been pretty successful in installing gnome, kde, xfce and enlightenment and not breaking on the next (dist)-upgrade.

enjoy antiX comsparks
Posts: 1,520
eriefisher
Joined: 07 Oct 2007
#9
comsparks wrote:I installed Gnome not the gnome-desktop-environment package. Yes I've gone through looking for an app and have not found anything that helped. I did try installing the G-D-E package and it said that It was already the most current. I keep running into people disliking Gnome for some reason. I've tried a ton of distributions and like Gnome apps a lot better than KDE apps. This version is the fastest one I've ever used and just blows the doors off any KDE out there I've tried for speed.
Sorry I can't be of more help with Gnome. I think as far as the apps are concerned, the gnome stuff is based on gtk which I believe is why there faster. Myself, for a full desktop, I prefer XFCE. It also uses gtk and is alot faster than gnome or kde.

When I want simplicity I switch over to Fluxbox. I have also installed E16 but I have a lot to learn about it. Imight just try to roll a E16/17 version of Antix. Maybe AntiE.

eriefisher
Posts: 11
comsparks
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
#10
Well I really appreciate all the help. I test a lot of distributions looking for the Holy Grail. Some have come close. Eriefisher, I too have checked those out as well and yes it's still a learning process. Anticapitalista, this too is a fine distribution and one to be considered as a keeper. I have erase and reloaded the Basic several times loading Gnome various ways but still come up with the same quirks. After digging deeper I found other things that weren't working up to par. I would tell you but I've lost my notepad. I think my cat hid it! Again! I've have since reloaded Ubuntu and filed the Basic for future study. I've found Ubuntu to be very stable and runs any Gnome application I throw at it. It's really up to the individual and their tastes as to what works right for them and Ubuntu seems to meet my needs between testing period. Thanks again.
Last edited by comsparks on 12 Jan 2008, 05:49, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 1,081
OU812
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
#11
I don't know if this helps or if it's related, but perhaps I had a similar problem: Before there was antixfce, I installed xfce on top of antix. It seemed to run fine until I tried changing gtk2 themes. At this point, things got weird - it was as if the antix and the xfce theme changers were struggling for control of the task. I believe I just kept going back and forth between the two apps until it worked. I wonder if something like this is happening to you?

john