topic title: fvwm-crystal
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,955
Site Admin
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
#16
You're welcome.

Bet you go back to fluxbox though. __{{emoticon}}__
Posts: 1,081
OU812
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
#17
I'm sorry that it was so difficult to install fvwm-crystal. I did mostly everything from synaptic:

1. turned off mepis repos
2. updated repos
3. installed fvwm-crystal
4. added this line to the fluxbox menu

Code: Select all

[restart] (FVWM) {fvwm-crystal}
5. used the menu to launch fvwm-crystal.

hope things improve for you.

john
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,955
Site Admin
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
#18
John

I think the main problem was with setting up the login screen. I also have been trying out fvwm-crystal, and it does work fast on my box.
I'm not sure I like the layout too much, but I guess it can also be configured quite easily.
In some ways it is (at the beginning) more intuitive for a new user than fluxbox, but it is much bigger size-wise ie 19MB download as opposed to just over 1MB for fluxbox and icewm.
Posts: 316
DJiNN
Joined: 26 Oct 2007
#19
anticapitalista wrote:You're welcome.

Bet you go back to fluxbox though. __{{emoticon}}__
Heehee, i'm already thinking about it. __{{emoticon}}__ I really like some of the things about fvwm-crystal, but there's also a lot that i'm not keen on. I do find fluxbox (& openbox for that matter) very configurable, & quite easily as well.

But, i'll keep it on here for now so i can have a good look at it & try different things out etc.

Fluxbox is definitely faster though. It's VERY snappy & responsive, even on this old PIII Celeron (600Mhz) with 128mb Ram.
Posts: 180
TLeeNorris
Joined: 04 Dec 2007
#20
Hey this is a cool looking desktop. Since I am using kdm I installed it and just chose it from the menu. It looks good.
Image